/ads:microsoft
Run an inline audit on a Microsoft Ads (formerly Bing Ads) account with 7 focused checks. Microsoft Ads often runs as a Google import—verify it's optimized for the platform.
Quick Start
/agileflow:ads:microsoft <account-data> # Microsoft Ads auditThe 7 Checks
| # | Check | Severity | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS-1 | UET tag installed | CRITICAL | Universal Event Tracking tag on all pages |
| MS-2 | Search partner performance | HIGH | Syndication partners monitored, poor ones disabled |
| MS-3 | Import quality from Google | HIGH | No broken bid strategies or unsupported features |
| MS-4 | Bid adjustments set | MEDIUM | Microsoft-specific bids (not just Google copy) |
| MS-5 | LinkedIn targeting | HIGH | LinkedIn demographics used for B2B targeting |
| MS-6 | Audience Ads opt-in reviewed | MEDIUM | Microsoft Audience Network reviewed for performance |
| MS-7 | Conversion goals | HIGH | Microsoft-native conversion tracking active |
Output
You receive:
- Microsoft Score (0-100)
- Check results - Pass/fail for all 7 checks
- Key recommendations - Top priorities to improve
- Microsoft-specific tips - Platform best practices
- Import quality assessment - If imported from Google
Account Data Needed
Provide details about your Microsoft Ads:
- UET tag installation status
- Import source (native or imported from Google)
- Budget and spend
- Campaign structure
- Bid adjustments configured
- LinkedIn targeting usage
- Conversion goal setup
- Search partner performance
Example format:
Microsoft Ads Setup
- Imported from Google 6 months ago
- 5 campaigns, $200/month total
- No bid adjustments beyond Google import
- Mostly default settings, not Microsoft-optimized
- No LinkedIn targeting used
Microsoft Ads Context
Why Microsoft?
- Lower CPCs than Google (5-10% less typical)
- Older, higher-income demographic
- Better for B2B (access to LinkedIn targeting)
- Less competitive keywords
- Smaller audience, but valuable
Who Uses It:
- B2B companies targeting decision-makers
- Local services in underserved markets
- E-commerce with higher-value customers
- Businesses wanting lower CPA than Google
Import Quality Issues
If you imported from Google, common problems:
| Issue | Impact | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Unsupported bid strategies | Won't work on Microsoft | Switch to supported strategies |
| Negative keyword list conflicts | Blocking good traffic | Re-import negative lists carefully |
| Campaign structure mismatch | Suboptimal targeting | Restructure for Microsoft |
| Device bid adjustments | May not transfer | Reconfigure for Microsoft |
| Audience targeting mismatch | Won't reach intended audience | Reset targeting for platform |
LinkedIn Targeting Advantage
Microsoft's unique advantage: LinkedIn profile targeting
This lets you target by:
- Company name
- Industry
- Job function
- Job title
- Seniority level
For B2B, this is extremely powerful. Example:
Target: Software developers at Fortune 500 companies
Google: Target keyword "Python developer", broad reach
Microsoft: Target LinkedIn "Software Developer" + "Fortune 500" = precise
Example Usage
Basic Audit
/agileflow:ads:microsoft "Microsoft: Imported from Google 3 months ago. No changes made since. Using same bid strategies and audiences as Google."
# Returns: Microsoft Score with import quality assessmentDetailed Audit
/agileflow:ads:microsoft
# Paste detailed account setup and performance data
# Returns: Full 7-check audit with optimization recommendationsExpected Improvements
By implementing recommendations:
- Proper import optimization - Fix broken strategies from Google import
- 5-10% CPA improvement - Microsoft Ads typically cheaper than Google
- Better audience targeting - LinkedIn profile targeting for B2B
- Search partner optimization - 2-5% improvement by disabling poor partners
Microsoft-Specific Strategies
B2B Targeting
LinkedIn targeting + keyword matching = powerful combo
Campaign: Target "VP Sales" at "Tech Companies"
Keywords: "sales enablement software"
Audiences: LinkedIn profile targeting
Result: Highly relevant, high-quality leads
Search Partner Optimization
- Microsoft Audience Network: Yahoo, AOL, DuckDuckGo
- Performance varies by partner
- Monitor individually, disable underperformers
- Start with all partners, disable low-ROI ones
Bid Adjustments
- Don't just copy from Google
- Microsoft's scale is different
- Often lower bids work here
- Monitor CPA carefully during transition
Tips
- Don't just "set and forget" imports - Google imports need Microsoft optimization
- LinkedIn targeting is differentiator - Use it for B2B campaigns
- Search partners matter - Monthly review and optimization
- Audience demographic older/higher income - Adjust messaging if needed
- Lower CPCs - Don't use Google bids, test lower Microsoft bids
When to Run
- After Google import - Verify import quality and optimize
- Monthly - Monitor search partner performance
- Performance decline - Diagnose optimization issues
- Quarterly review - Comprehensive strategy assessment
Related Commands
/ads:audit- Full multi-platform audit/ads:plan- Campaign planning/ads:google- Google Ads for comparison
On This Page
/ads:microsoftQuick StartThe 7 ChecksOutputAccount Data NeededMicrosoft Ads ContextImport Quality IssuesLinkedIn Targeting AdvantageExample UsageBasic AuditDetailed AuditExpected ImprovementsMicrosoft-Specific StrategiesB2B TargetingSearch Partner OptimizationBid AdjustmentsTipsWhen to RunRelated Commands