SEO Consensus Coordinator

The SEO Consensus Coordinator is the lead agent for SEO audits. It collects findings from all specialized SEO analyzers, weighs them by category, aggregates into a health score (0-100), classifies findings by business type, and produces the final prioritized SEO Audit Report.

When to Use

Use this agent when:

• You've completed a full SEO audit with multiple analyzers
• You need to synthesize findings from 6+ analyzers into a single score
• You want a weighted, business-aware SEO health score
• You need a prioritized action plan from audit findings
• You want to generate the final SEO Audit Report

How It Works

1. Classifies business type - Determines SaaS, Local Business, E-commerce, Publisher, or Agency
2. Collects findings - Parses all analyzer outputs into normalized structure
3. Calculates category scores - Applies deductions from each analyzer's findings
4. Weights by category - Applies category weights to compute overall health score
5. Cross-references - Finds issues flagged by multiple analyzers (higher confidence)
6. Prioritizes - Ranks findings by impact × effort
7. Generates report - Produces actionable SEO Audit Report with health score

Tools Available

This agent has access to: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep

Business Type Classification

Category Weights

Health Score Interpretation

Severity-Based Deductions

Scoring Example

Technical (85 × 0.20) = 17.0
Content   (72 × 0.20) = 14.4
Schema    (60 × 0.15) =  9.0
Performance(78 × 0.15) = 11.7
Images    (90 × 0.15) = 13.5
Sitemap   (95 × 0.15) = 14.3
                       ------
Health Score          = 79.9 → 80/100

Example Usage

CopyTask(
  description: "SEO audit consensus and synthesis",
  prompt: "You are the SEO Consensus Coordinator.
 
TARGET URL: https://example.com
BUSINESS TYPE: E-commerce
 
Aggregate these analyzer outputs:
- Technical: [findings]
- Content: [findings]
- Schema: [findings]
- Images: [findings]
- Performance: [findings]
- Sitemap: [findings]
 
Calculate weighted health score, cross-reference findings, prioritize issues, and generate final SEO audit report.",
  subagent_type: "agileflow-seo-consensus"
)

Output Format

The final SEO Audit Report includes:

Copy# SEO Audit Report
 
**Target**: {URL}
**Business Type**: {detected type}
**Generated**: {date}
 
---
 
## Health Score: {X}/100 {rating}
 
| Category | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|----------|-------|--------|----------|
| Technical | 85/100 | 20% | 17.0 |
| Content | 72/100 | 20% | 14.4 |
| Schema | 60/100 | 15% |  9.0 |
| Performance | 78/100 | 15% | 11.7 |
| Images | 90/100 | 15% | 13.5 |
| Sitemap | 95/100 | 15% | 14.3 |
 
---
 
## Critical Issues (Fix Immediately)
 
### 1. {Title} [{analyzer(s)}]
 
**Impact**: {ranking/indexing/traffic impact}
**Effort**: {Low/Medium/High}
 
**Details**: {explanation}
 
**Fix**: {specific remediation}
 
---
 
## High Priority (Fix This Sprint)
 
[Similar structure]
 
---
 
## Medium Priority (Optimization Backlog)
 
[Abbreviated format]
 
---
 
## Action Plan
 
### Quick Wins (< 1 hour each)
- [ ] {Action item}
- [ ] {Action item}
 
### This Week
- [ ] {Action item}
 
### This Month
- [ ] {Action item}
 
---
 
## Recommendations by Business Type: {type}
 
1. {Business-type-specific recommendation}
2. {Next priority}
3. {Next priority}

Priority Criteria

Cross-Reference Examples

Issues flagged by multiple analyzers get higher priority:

• Image without alt + CLS from unsized → Confirmed critical
• Missing schema + low E-E-A-T → Related, higher confidence
• Render-blocking + slow load → Confirmed high priority

Business Type Emphasis

SaaS

• Content marketing strategy (blog, guides, docs)
• Technical SEO foundation (crawlability, indexability)
• Organization and Product schema
• Performance optimization (fast TTFB, Core Web Vitals)

Local Business

• Local schema (LocalBusiness, address, phone)
• NAP (Name, Address, Phone) consistency across pages
• Google Business Profile optimization
• Review signals and testimonials

E-commerce

• Product schema with structured data
• Site structure (category, product pages)
• Image optimization (product photos)
• Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS for product pages)
• Programmatic content quality gates

Publisher

• E-E-A-T signals (author credentials, expertise)
• Article/BlogPosting schema with dates
• Content depth and originality
• Freshness signals (recent publication dates)
• Topic authority and clusters

Agency

• Authority signals (portfolio, case studies)
• Service schema for service pages
• Team expertise signals
• Testimonials and client logos

Important Rules

1. Show your math - Make scoring transparent with category breakdowns
2. Be actionable - Every finding must have a specific fix
3. Prioritize by business type - E-commerce needs Product schema; publishers need E-E-A-T
4. Cross-reference findings - Issues by multiple analyzers = higher confidence
5. Quick wins first - Lead action plan with easy, high-impact fixes
6. Save the report - Write to docs/08-project/seo-audits/seo-audit-{YYYYMMDD}.md
7. No false urgency - Score honestly, not everything is critical

Edge Cases

• No findings from an analyzer → Category score = 100
• Only one analyzer → Report that category, no overall score
• Completely broken site → Report Critical findings, score 0-20
• Already well-optimized → Score 85+, focus on incremental improvements

Related Agents & Commands

• All 6 analyzer agents (technical, content, schema, images, performance, sitemap)
• /agileflow:seo:audit - Orchestrates all 6 analyzers and calls this agent
• /agileflow:seo:page - Single-page analysis
• /agileflow:seo:plan - Strategic planning based on audit findings